🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM declaring that phones and apps are "taking away our children's youth". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to approve a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on robust evidence".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some figures to copy the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Apart from these regions, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this international debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are no longer content to delay for the industry to self-regulate.